Notices

Calendar

8 June, Wednesday. End of third quarter of Easter Term.

12 June, Sunday. Whitsunday. Scarlet Day.

14 June, Tuesday. Discussion at 2 p.m. in the Council Room (see below).

17 June, Friday. Full Term ends.

19 June, Sunday. Trinity Sunday. Scarlet Day.

23 June, Thursday at 11.30 a.m. (Honorary Degrees)

25 June, Saturday. Easter Term ends.

Discussions at 2 p.m. 5 July

Congregations 30 June, Thursday at 9.30 a.m. (General Admission) 1 July, Friday at 9.30 a.m. (General Admission) 2 July, Saturday at 9.30 a.m. (General Admission) 23 July, Saturday at 11 a.m.

Notice of a Discussion on Tuesday, 14 June 2011

The Vice-Chancellor invites those qualified under the regulations for Discussions (Statutes and Ordinances, p. 107) to attend a Discussion in the Council Room, on Tuesday, 14 June 2011, at 2 p.m., for the discussion of the Report of the Council, dated 30 May 2011, on the relocation of the University Farm from North West Cambridge to Madingley (Reporter, 2010–11, p. 893).

The Reports published in this issue will be discussed on 5 July 2011.

Amending Statutes for Magdalene College: Notice

6 June 2011

The Vice-Chancellor begs leave to refer to his Notice of 18 May 2011 (Reporter, 2010–11, p. 814), concerning proposed amending Statutes for Magdalene College. He hereby gives notice that in the opinion of the Council, the proposed Statutes make no alteration of any Statute which affects the University, and do not require the consent of the University; that the interests of the University are not prejudiced by them, and that the Council has resolved to take no action upon them, provided that the Council will wish to reconsider the proposed Statutes if they have not been submitted to the Privy Council by 6 June 2012.

Professorial Pay Review 2010: Notice

The Vice-Chancellor, in accordance with Annex 7 of the Second Joint Report of the Council and General Board on a New Pay and Grading Structure for Non-Clinical Staff (Reporter, 2004–05, p. 745), and with the assistance of an Advisory Committee comprising Sir Graeme Davies (Chairman), Professor Sir Tony Atkinson (Nuffield College, Oxford), Professor Sir Martin Harris (President, Clare Hall), Professor Susan Iversen (Pro-Vice-Chancellor, Special Projects, University of Oxford), Professor Sir John O’Reilly (Vice-Chancellor, Cranfield University), and Professor Nigel Weiss, CL, carried out an assessment of applications for a review of professorial pay received from eligible Professors. The Advisory Group were assisted by School-level Committees* which undertook the initial assessment of applications in Band 1. Progression within and between bands is not automatic and is based on contribution, as described in Annex 7 of the Joint Report, and assessed through a biennial review process. The Vice-Chancellor has informed all applicants of the outcome of this review.

The number of awards made as a result of this exercise are as follows:

					Awards
	Eligible		Applied		Band 1		Band 2		Band 3		Band 4		Total
School	M	F	M	F	M	F	M	F	M	F	M	F	M	F
Arts and Humanities	57	17	17	5	6	1	5	3	3	1	0	0	14	5
Biological Sciences	69	18	22	9	8	2	9	5	1	1	3	0	21	8
Clinical Medicine	17	7	4	3	0	1	3	1	1	1	0	0	4	3
Humanities and Social Sciences	69	19	25	7	5	3	9	1	1	1	0	0	15	5
Physical Sciences	134	10	48	5	14	3	11	1	6	0	4	1	35	5
Technology	73	5	33	1	10	0	16	0	4	1	0	0	30	1
Total	419	76	149	30	43	10	53	11	16	5	7	1	119	27

The following table summarizes the distribution of awards across the Schools, as at 1 October 2010, according to the information available at the time of publication.

	Base		Band 1		Band 2		Band 3		Band 4		Total
School	M	F	M	F	M	F	M	F	M	F	M	F
Arts and Humanities	12	5	19	4	19	7	7	1	0	0	57	17
Biological Sciences	18	7	19	3	22	6	5	2	5	0	69	18
Clinical Medicine	1	1	5	4	7	1	3	1	1	0	17	7
Humanities and Social Sciences	12	4	15	9	32	4	8	2	2	0	69	19
Physical Sciences	39	4	40	4	33	1	15	0	7	1	134	10
Technology	16	0	22	2	28	1	7	2	0	0	73	5
Total	98	21	120	26	141	20	45	8	15	1	419	76
% of column Total1	23%	28%	29%	34%	34%	26%	11%	11%	4%	1%

* Membership of the School-level Committees comprised:

Arts and Humanities: Professor Heal (Chairman), Faculty of Philosophy; Professor Boyle, Department of German; Professor Duffy, Faculty of Divinity; Professor Osborne, Faculty of Classics; Professor Trotter, Faculty of English; and Professor Sir Martin Harris (President, Clare Hall).

Biological Sciences: Professor Laskey (Chairman), Hutchison/MRC Research Centre; Professor Sir David Baulcombe, Department of Plant Sciences; Professor Gilligan, Department of Plant Sciences; Professor Robbins, Department of Experimental Psychology; Professor Dame Jean Thomas, Department of Biochemistry; and Professor Iversen (Pro-Vice-Chancellor, Special Projects, University of Oxford).

Clinical Medicine: Professor Sissons, (Chairman), Department of Medicine; Professor Bradley, Department of Surgery; Professor Khaw, Department of Public Health and Primary Care; Professor Luzio, Department of Clinical Biochemistry; Professor Todd, Department of Medical Genetics; and Professor Iversen (Pro-Vice-Chancellor, Special Projects, University of Oxford).

Humanities and Social Sciences: Professor Evans (Chairman), Faculty of History; Professor Sir John Baker, Faculty of Law; Professor Gamble, Faculty of Politics, Psychology, Sociology, and International Studies; Professor Ogilvie, Faculty of Economics; Professor Wikstrom, Institute of Criminology; and Professor Sir Tony Atkinson (Nuffield College, Oxford).

Physical Sciences: Professor Sanders, (Chairman), Department of Chemistry; Professor Bennett, Department of Geography; Professor Dame Athene Donald, Department of Physics; Professor Huppert, Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics; Professor Kelly, Department of Pure Mathematics and Mathematical Statistics; and Professor Weiss, Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics.

Technology: Professor Mair (Chairman), Department of Engineering; Professor Dame Sandra Dawson, Judge Business School; Professor Dame Ann Dowling, Department of Engineering; Professor Hopper, Computer Laboratory; Professor Slater, Department of Chemical Engineering and Biotechnology; and Professor Sir John O’Reilly (Vice-Chancellor, Cranfield University).

Ballot on Graces 6 and 7 of 26 May 2011: Notice of amendments and revised timetable for ballot

3 June 2011

The Vice-Chancellor gives notice that he has received proposals for amendments to Graces 6 and 7 of 26 May 2011 (Reporter, p. 860).

The Graces at present read as follows:

6. (Grace A in the Council’s Report, dated 17 May 2011 (Reporter, 2010–11, p. 785))

That, subject to an access agreement being agreed between the University and the Director of Fair Access to Higher Education, the total expenditure per annum on maintenance bursaries, fee waivers and Widening Participation activity be set at a minimum of £14m, instead of the ‘approximately £10m’ figure proposed in the Notice of 23 February 2011.

7. (Grace B in the Council’s Report, dated 17 May 2011 (Reporter, 2010–11, p. 785))

That, in the event that Grace [6] is not approved, subject to an access agreement being agreed between the University and the Director of Fair Access to Higher Education, the total expenditure per annum on maintenance bursaries, fee waivers and Widening Participation activity be set at a minimum of £12m, instead of the ‘approximately £10m’ figure proposed in the Notice of 23 February 2011.

The amendments read as follows:

Amendment 1:

That initiated Grace 6 of 26 May be amended so as to read:

That, subject to an access agreement being agreed between the University and the Director of Fair Access to Higher Education, the total expenditure per annum on maintenance bursaries, fee waivers and Widening Participation activity be set at a minimum of £14m, instead of the ‘approximately £10m’ figure proposed in the Notice of 23 February 2011 and that (1) the additional £4 million expenditure proposed not include expenditure already allocated to maintenance bursaries, fee waivers and Widening Participation activity (whether declared in the proposed access agreement or not).

Amendment 2:

That initiated Grace 7 of 26 May be amended so as to read:

That, in the event that Grace [6] is not approved, subject to an access agreement being agreed between the University and the Director of Fair Access to Higher Education, the total expenditure per annum on maintenance bursaries, fee waivers and Widening Participation activity be set at a minimum of £12m, instead of the ‘approximately £10m’ figure proposed in the Notice of 23 February 2011 and that (1) the additional £2 million expenditure proposed not include expenditure already allocated to maintenance bursaries, fee waivers and Widening Participation activity (whether declared in the proposed access agreement or not).

Amendment 3:

That initiated Grace 6 of 26 May be amended so as to read:

That, subject to an access agreement being agreed between the University and the Director of Fair Access to Higher Education, the total expenditure per annum on maintenance bursaries, fee waivers and Widening Participation activity be set at a minimum of £14m, instead of the ‘approximately £10m’ figure proposed in the Notice of 23 February 2011 and that (2) the additional £4 million expenditure proposed be allocated from the Chest.

Amendment 4:

That initiated Grace 7 of 26 May be amended so as to read:

That, in the event that Grace [6] is not approved, subject to an access agreement being agreed between the University and the Director of Fair Access to Higher Education, the total expenditure per annum on maintenance bursaries, fee waivers and Widening Participation activity be set at a minimum of £12m, instead of the ‘approximately £10m’ figure proposed in the Notice of 23 February 2011 and that (2) the additional £2 million expenditure proposed be allocated from the Chest.

The amendments have been proposed by the following members of the Regent House:

A. Ahmed	A. Galy	M. F. Moss
J. K. Aitken	R. Geuss	B. F. Musallam
Maike Albertzart	D. J. Goode	David Orton
R. Ansell	Bart Hallmark	Michael Rice
M. B. Beckles	M. G. Hayes	H. Sanderson
R. Bunce	Ronald S. Haynes	W. Schultz
Rachel Camina	H. High	J. Scott-Warren
H. Canuto	C. Jardine	S. R. S. Szreter
C. Chamarette	K. M. Jeary	A. S. Tavernor
Clare Chambers	Neil Kenny	Jeremy Thurlow
Nicky Clayton	J. Lecky-Thompson	E. Tipper
S. M. Connell	M. Lucas-Smith	Isobel Urquhart
Carly Crouch	B. R. Martin	Bhaskar Vira
T. De Mulder	L. McMahon	Daniel H. Weiss
R. W. Farndale	Iris Möller	M. B. Wingate

REVISED TIMETABLE FOR THE BALLOT ON GRACES 6–13 OF 26 MAY 2011

The Council in its Second Report (Reporter, p. 785 http://www.admin.cam.ac.uk/reporter/2010-11/weekly/6226/section1.shtml#heading2-8, last paragraph) noted that if amendments to Graces 6–13 of 26 May 2011 were received the Ballot would be held over to the Michaelmas Term. However the Council believes it is appropriate to conduct the ballot as soon as possible. It has therefore agreed that the timetable for the ballot on these Graces published in Reporter, p. 817 should be extended to allow for fly-sheets to be circulated on the above amendments. Voting papers and fly-sheets will now be distributed on or before Monday, 11 July 2011, to be returned by 5 p.m. on Friday, 12 August 2011. The Registrary will arrange for the printing and circulation of any fly-sheet on these amendments, signed by ten or more members of the Regent House, which reaches him by 1 p.m. on Thursday, 23 June 2011. Fly-sheets must bear, in addition to the signatures, the names and initials (in block capitals) of the signatories (Statutes and Ordinances, p. 112).

New building at 7 West Road: Notice

6 June 2011

The Council, on the advice of its Executive Committee and of the General Board, has approved a proposal that the new building at 7 West Road be named the Alison Richard Building in honour of the Vice-Chancellor Emerita.

The new building will house the Department of Politics and International Studies, the Centre for Research in the Arts, Social Sciences, and Humanities (CRASSH), the Centres of African Studies, Latin-American Studies, and South Asian Studies, and the Development Studies Committee and the Mongolian and Inner Asian Studies Unit.

Review of IT Infrastructure and Support: Notice

At its meeting on 6 December 2010, the Council accepted the recommendation from the Working Groups on Organizational and Financial Efficiency that there should be a full review of IT infrastructure and support across the University.

The membership of the Review Committee is as follows:

Professor Keith Burnett, Vice-Chancellor of the University of Sheffield (Chair)

Professor Howard Chase, Head of the School of Technology

Professor Steve Oliver, Chair of the Information Services and Strategy Syndicate

Professor Steve Young, Pro-Vice-Chancellor for Planning and Resources

Dr Rachael Padman, Member of Council and General Board

Alison Allden, Chief Executive, Higher Education Statistics Agency

Dr Jim Bellingham, Secretary of the School of the Physical Sciences (Secretary)

The terms of reference are as follows:

1.The Review Committee is charged with making recommendations to the Council and General Board for the governance, organization, and strategic development of IT infrastructure and support across the University, excepting only that provision made by the Colleges.

2.The Review Committee is asked in particular to consider:

•the scope and content of the strategy for IT infrastructure and support and the services to be provided;

•the appropriate governance structure to develop the strategy, keep it under review, and monitor its effectiveness;

•the appropriate management structure to implement the strategy and deliver the services taking account of opportunities for shared services and out-sourcing;

•the most effective and efficient organization of computing support staff within the central services and elsewhere;

•the annual budget, and provision for capital.

Modus Operandi

While the Committee will need to establish the detail of its modus operandi, it is expected to be broadly as follows. There will be a call for evidence (see below), and consideration of that evidence and other material. It is expected that the Committee will hold a small number of open sessions in the Michaelmas Term, followed by interviews. It is then expected that the Committee will publish a draft report and recommendations for discussion across the University, before finalizing its report to the Council and General Board.

Call for evidence

Any member of the University with observations that will assist the Review Committee should send them to Dr Jim Bellingham, Secretary of the School of the Physical Sciences (email jrb13@cam.ac.uk) by 31 August 2011. There will also be a discussion forum on the intranet for the submission and discussion of views.

Evidence or views on any aspect of the review are welcome, but it would be of particular interest to the Committee if views could be submitted in particular on:

•the need for a more coherent IT strategy across the University;

•whether the present management structure including two central organizations (the University Computing Service (UCS) and the Management and Information Services Division of the Unified Administrative Service (MISD)) can be improved;

•whether the University at present has the right balance between centrally and departmentally managed provision;

•whether there are aspects of the current level of service which could be improved;

•whether the design and implementation of large IT systems adequately reflect the needs of users, and if not, suggestions as to how this can be improved;

•whether we have the right arrangements in place for the effective and efficient organization of computing support staff, and whether more can be done to provide appropriate career structures and opportunities;

•whether there is scope for cost savings and/or service improvements through greater sharing of services, or out-sourcing.

Revised single Equal Opportunities Policy: Notice

6 June 2011

In their Joint Report on a Combined Equality Scheme on race, disability, and gender (Reporter, 2009–10, p. 1117), the Council and the General Board advised the University that amendments would be put forward to the University on the existing Equal Opportunities Policy and the other existing separate University policies for disability, gender, race, and religion and belief (Statutes and Ordinances, pp. 150–3).

This Notice presents a revised single Equal Opportunities Policy to replace the existing five separate University policies listed above with one that consolidates all existing policies and incorporates requirements regarding the new protected characteristics1 covered by the provisions of the Equality Act 2010. The revised policy also refers to the Combined Equality Scheme, which was approved by Grace 2 of 8 December 2010, as the mechanism by which it will implement this policy and meet its legal obligations. Such amendments have also been necessitated by the passing of the Equality Act which increases the list of protected groups and extended protections and their scope.

Revised Equal Opportunities Policy

The revised Equal Opportunities Policy set out in the Annex to this Notice updates the existing policy and introduces the principal changes required by the Equality Act 2010. These changes are:

•the inclusion of all protected groups and individuals covered by the law

•the extension of protections from perceptive and associative discrimination

•the inclusion of the revised general public equality duties

•the removal of references to repealed legislation2 and abolished organizations.

•Should legal amendments lead to additional groups being added to the list of protected characteristics,3 this generic policy would only need minimal further revision to maintain organizational compliance.

The Council, with the concurrence of the General Board, is accordingly submitting a Grace to the Regent House (Grace 1, p. 925) for approval to adopt the revised Equal Opportunities Policy set out in the Annex to this Notice and to rescind the separate Disability, Gender, Race, and Religion and Belief Policies.

Annex

Proposed Equal Opportunities Policy

REVISED EQUAL OPPORTUNITIES POLICY

The University of Cambridge is committed in its pursuit of academic excellence to equality of opportunity and to a pro-active and inclusive approach to equality, which supports and encourages all under-represented groups, promotes an inclusive culture, and values diversity. This commitment is underpinned by the University’s core values, expressed in its mission statement:

•freedom of thought and expression,

•freedom from discrimination.

The University is therefore committed to a policy and practice which require that, for students, admission to the University and progression within undergraduate and graduate studies will be determined only by personal merit and by performance. For staff, entry into employment with the University and progression within employment will be determined only by personal merit and by the application of criteria which are related to the duties and conditions of each particular post and the needs of the institution concerned.

Subject to statutory provisions, no student, member of staff, applicant for admission as a student, or applicant for appointment as a member of staff will be treated less favourably than another because of her or his belonging to a protected group. This commitment applies to a former student, alumnus or alumna, or former employee where the alleged unlawful conduct arises out of and is closely connected to the former student’s or former staff member’s previous relationship with the University.

Protected groups are defined in the Equality Act 2010 as Sex, Gender Reassignment, Marriage or Civil Partnership, Pregnancy or Maternity, Race (including Ethnic or National Origin, Nationality or Colour), Disability, Sexual Orientation, Age, or Religion or Belief. The University respects all religious and philosophical beliefs, as well as the lack of religion or belief, and the right of all members of its community to discuss and debate these issues freely.

If any person admitted as a student or appointed as a member of staff considers that he or she is suffering from unlawful discrimination, harassment, or victimization in her or his admission, appointment, or progression through the University because of belonging to any of the above protected groups, he or she may make a complaint, which will be dealt with through the agreed procedures for complaints or grievances or the procedures for dealing with bullying and harassment, as appropriate.

The University will take active steps to promote good practice. In particular it will:

(a)work towards the elimination of unlawful discrimination, harassment, and victimization based on a protected characteristic, whether actual, perceptive, or associative;

(b)advance equality of opportunity between persons who share a protected characteristic and persons who do not share it;

(c)foster good relations between persons who share a protected characteristic and persons who do not share it;

(d)subject its policies to continuous assessment in order to examine how they affect protected groups and to identify whether its policies help to achieve equality of opportunity for all these groups, or whether they have an adverse impact;

(e)monitor the recruitment and progress of all students and staff, collecting and collating equalities information and data as required by law or for the furtherance of University equalities objectives;

(f)promote an inclusive culture, good practice in teaching, learning, and assessment, and good management practice, through the development of codes of best practice, policies, and training;

(g)take positive action wherever possible to support this policy and its aims, and

(h)publish this policy widely amongst staff and students, together with policy assessments, equality analysis and results of monitoring.

The Equal Opportunities Policy will be enacted through by the University’s Equality Objectives, associated implementation plans, and the Combined Equality Scheme.4 The Combined Equality Scheme explains how the University will fulfil its statutory obligations in relation to equalities legislation.

It considers:

•Governance and Policy Development, including relevant committees, compliance, equal pay, assessing the impact of policies and practices and reporting;

•Developing and Implementing Best Practice;

•Inclusive Practice for Students and Staff – including the University’s Diversity Networks, Dignity at Work, and Dignity at Study procedures;

•Promotion of Equality and Diversity, including relevant diversity events, training, and guidance, and

•Data and Information Provision, including appropriate monitoring and compliance reporting.

Progress against actions and objectives will be reported in the Equality and Diversity Annual Reviews and Data Reports.5

The University will meet all statutory obligations under relevant legislation and, where appropriate, anticipate future legal requirements. This will be informed by:

•The Equality Act (2010) and associated secondary legislation

•Criminal Justice and Immigration Act (2008)

•The Racial and Religious Hatred Act (2006)

•The Civil Partnership Act (2004)

•The Gender Recognition Act (2004)

•Criminal Justice Act (2003)

•The Human Rights Act (1998)

•The Protection from Harassment Act (1997)

•Special Education Needs and Disability Act (2001).

In addition, this will be informed by the Codes of Practice or Guidance issued by the Equality and Human Rights Commission and other relevant bodies. These Codes are not legally binding (though they are admissible as evidence in Employment Tribunals) and the University supports them fully.

This policy will be amended as appropriate to meet the demands of future legislation.

University Composition Fees: Notice

6 June 2011

The Council has recently been notified by Universities UK of the recommended fees for students from the Channel Islands and the Isle of Man in 2011–12. Universities UK has agreed with the Island authorities the method for their calculation. The formula uses the HEFCE base price in each of the four HEFCE price groups with proportionate additions at different rates for ‘non-research’ and ‘research’ universities. The HEFCE base prices are lower in 2011–12 than in 2010–11 and the recommended fees are therefore also lower. The reduced funding for Island students parallels the reduction in funding for Home/EU students.

There is a cost to the University in reducing the fees, but the Island governments will not pay fees in excess of the agreed rates, and income may therefore be the same whether the fees are set at, or higher than, the agreed rates.

The Council is submitting a Grace (Grace 2, p. 925) to amend the Table of Fees attached to the regulations for University Composition Fees (Statutes and Ordinances, p. 161) accordingly.

Allowances to candidates for examinations: Notice

6 June 2011

The Council gives notice that, on the recommendation of its Standing Committee for Applications, and after consulting the Senior Tutors’ Committee, it has agreed to amend the regulations governing allowances to candidates for examinations (Statutes and Ordinances, p. 230). The amendments take account of the relevant recommendations of the Joint Report of the Council and the General Board, dated 15 November and 1 November 2010, on the future of Ordinary Examinations and the Ordinary B.A. Degree (Reporter, 2010–11, p. 208, approved by Grace 5 of 15 December 2010). They also reflect the Standing Committee’s policy on the number of allowances it may grant to a candidate. The opportunity has also been taken to update the Councils’ Notice (previously dating from 1972–73) as set out below, so as to reflect the Standing Committee’s current policies and procedures.

The Council is submitting a Grace to the Regent House (Grace 3, p. 925) for approval of the amended regulations.

Leave for Allowances to Candidates for Examinations: Notice

The Council has given notice (Reporter, 2010–11, p. 903) of the procedure required by it when dealing with applications under these regulations:

(i)No application is considered unless it is submitted by the candidate’s Tutor.

(ii)An application must state under which regulation or regulations it is made.

(b)or 3(a)(i) is normally granted in respect of the three terms of an academical year. Exceptionally it may be granted in respect of the terms of more than one academical year.

(iv)An application made on medical grounds must be supported by a certificate, preferably given by a doctor practising in or near Cambridge or by a counsellor from the University Counselling Service. The Council’s Standing Committee on Applications may determine which type of certificate it requires in relation to applications under particular regulations.

(v)An application must include a detailed statement of reasons and be accompanied by copies of all supervision reports.

(vi)An application for exemption from an academic condition for taking a particular examination is not normally approved unless the Faculty Board or similar body concerned have given their concurrence, and that concurrence is indispensable in the case of examinations forming part of the requirements for a professional qualification.

(vii)The Council is not empowered to give permission for a candidate to offer a combination of papers, whether within one examination or from more than one examination, which is not provided for by Ordinance or by regulations made under Ordinance. Permission to offer a non-standard combination of papers can be given only by the General Board; such permission will not be granted unless the Faculty Board or other authority concerned are in agreement.

(viii)The Council shall authorize its Standing Committee on Applications to issue notes on the procedures adopted by that Committee in its consideration, on behalf of the Council, of applications for allowances under these regulations.

Grace for submission to the Regent House under the provisions of Statute A, VIII, 7

The Registrary has received for submission to the Regent House under the provisions of Statute A, VIII, 7, the following Grace initiated by 149 members of the Regent House. The Council will consider the Grace at its meeting on 13 June.

Grace:

That, in the light of sweeping cuts to the HE budget, the trebling of tuition fees, and incoherent access policies, all decided on without adequate consultation, the University shall communicate to HM Government, by June 24, 2011 or as soon as possible thereafter, that it has no confidence in the policies of the Minister of State for Universities and Science, and that this duty be delegated to the Council.

Peter Andra’s Agócs	Priyamvada Gopal	Amy M. E. Morris
T. Alberts	R. Gordon	Charles Moseley
Rachel Alexander	Mina Gorji	Joseph Moshenska
Mete Atature	Fiona Green	Subha Mukherji
Tarak Barkawi	Jochen Guck	Kamal Munir
P. J. Barton	M. J. Gwiazda	John Naughton
J. Beck	P. R. Hardie	Máire Ní Mhaonaigh
M. B. Beckles	Linda M. Hargreaves	P. O’Donnell
Duncan Bell	Rachael Harris	J. Oppenheim
Simon Blackburn	Ronald Haynes	S. Page
Deborah Bowman	H. High	Jane Partner
Elizabeth Boyle	David Hillman	I. Patterson
Rowan Boyson	Mary Hilton	A. Piliavsky
Nuzhat Bukhari	Edward Holberton	Jennifer Pollard
B. J. Burchell	Robin Holloway	Sophie Read
Chris Burlinson	John Hopkins	Diane Reay
J. Butterfield	S. Houghton-Walker	Alastair J. Reid
Timothy Button	S. F. Howard	R. J. E. Riley
S. Cain	J. R. Howlett	Ian G. Roberts
J. Chamarette	M. Hrebeniak	M. S. Rodrigues Alves de Magalhaes
Clare Chambers	Michael D. Hurley	L. Ruprecht
Sally K. Church	A. Iserles	C. Russell
David Clifford	M. L. Jacobus	P. Russell
F. Colucci	Ian James	Yvonne Salmon
Phil Connell	Simon Jarvis	M. G. Sargeant
J. C. Cook	Kate M. Jeary	J. Scott-Warren
Helen Cooper	Henri Johnston	R. K. Simmons
Y. Cordeaux	C. A. Jones	Peter Smith
J. Craigwood	A. Kabla	Philip Stephenson
M. Crowley	Eivind Kahrs	Morag Styles
Devon Curtis	Ulrich Keyser	S. R. S. Szreter
A. Damlé	A. King	Trudi Tate
Mark R. Darlow	J. King	Alice Taylor
S. Davis	Lawrence King	D. Thom
N. R. M. de Lange	R. Kirkpatrick	David Trotter
T. De Mulder	Mary Laven	A. W. Truman
I. N. Divanna	M. Leggatt	Isobel Urquhart
Harri Englund	H. Lillehammer	M. Vaughan
B. Etherington	Maria Manuel Lisboa	Vincenzo Vergiani
Georgina Evans	R. Love	J. M. B. Wallace
A. Fauverge	M. Lucas-Smith	C. G. Warnes
Tamara L. Follini	Fraser MacBride	Ruth Watson
C. Gagne	J. M. Massing	Darin Weinberg
Anna Gannon	R. McLellan	D. A. Whitley
S. Garrigan-Mattar	L. McMahon	E. Wilson-Lee
V. A. C. Gatrell	J. J. Meggitt	Stuart Wimbush
R. Geuss	Leo Mellor	P. Withington
Nicholas Gibson	R. Mengham	Nicolette Zeeman
Heather Glen	Silke Mentchen	Andrew Zurcher
M. S. Golding	P. Mody