Skip to main contentCambridge University Reporter

No 6392

Wednesday 24 June 2015

Vol cxlv No 36

pp. 651–692

Reports

Joint Report of the Council and the General Board on the University's student disciplinary procedures

The Council and the General Board beg leave to report to the University as follows:

1. In April 2014, the Council and the General Board established a Review Committee on Student Discipline to consider the fitness for purpose and practical operation of the University's student disciplinary procedures. The review was prompted by the following:

the tensions between the University's disciplinary and complaints procedures that had been revealed by two recent cases;

the consultation on a Good Practice Framework for Complaints and Appeals Procedures by the Office of the Independent Adjudicator (OIA), the final version of which was published by the OIA in December 2014 for implementation from October 2015;

the Chair of the Faculty of Law had identified some concerns about the support for the University Advocate and whether the role could be sustained in its current form.

The membership and terms of reference of the Review Committee are included in the Appendix to this Report.

2. The Committee has conducted an initial review, comparing the University's disciplinary procedures with those of other institutions, and has agreed that they are now in need of fundamental reform. The procedures are based on a juridical model that is no longer appropriate, they are unwieldy and not easy to follow, and they are not agile enough to deal swiftly with less serious or less complex cases. The Committee also notes that the speed with which the University concludes cases within its disciplinary and student complaints procedures is a concern to the OIA.

3. Given the scale of the changes anticipated, the Council and the General Board have accepted the Committee's recommendation that the review process should be carried out in two stages; this approach is also supported by the Senior Tutors' Committee. This Report proposes a set of changes as part of the first stage of the review, most of which are aimed at providing more immediate improvements to the disciplinary process (see paragraph 4). The second part of the review will focus on developing a structure that enables the resolution of disciplinary matters in a timely, appropriate, and fair manner, so that cases of minor misconduct can be dealt with more swiftly, reserving fuller consideration for more complex or serious matters, and providing better support and more accessible guidance to students and others on the University's disciplinary processes. A simpler structure which can respond proportionately to cases will serve the interests of both the students charged and others supporting the disciplinary procedures. The Committee will also review other aspects of the student disciplinary procedures, including the responsibilities of those currently supporting the procedures, the interplay between the disciplinary procedures and other procedures – particularly the Student Complaints Procedure – and the role of mediation. Further consultation will be taken on any proposals before bringing forward a second Report.

4. If approved, the changes in this Report will:

(a) enable the separation of disciplinary processes relating to students from those relating to other members of the University, at this first stage by removing detailed provisions concerning the student disciplinary structure from Statute and relocating them in Special Ordinance (see paragraph 5), with a view to developing a framework specifically for the discipline of students in the second stage of the review;

(b) address particular issues identified by the Committee, set out below, to assist in streamlining and providing certainty in the existing processes, and reducing their formality:

(i)Changes to the process for the appointment of the Chair of the Court of Discipline and an increase from ten to twenty in the number of members of panel (b) from which other members of the Court are drawn, to overcome difficulties in constituting the Court.

(ii)Amendments to bring within the jurisdiction of the Court of Discipline: cases relating to non-member awards; and cases, currently heard by the University Tribunal, in which a person not in statu pupillari is charged with a matter relating to their studies, such as plagiarism.

(iii)Amendments to indicate that, in circumstances where the same facts give rise to a disciplinary charge against a student and a complaint is brought by the same student under the Student Complaints Procedure, disciplinary proceedings will normally be stayed by the Chair of the Court of Discipline until completion of the Student Complaints Procedure (and the conclusion of the consideration of any complaint raised with the OIA arising on completion of that procedure).

(iv)Similar amendments to those outlined above to indicate that, in cases where the same circumstances give rise to both a disciplinary case and a criminal charge, the disciplinary proceedings will normally be stayed by the Chair of the Court of Discipline until the criminal proceedings have been concluded or it is clear that no charge will be brought.

(v)Under current Statute D II 16, the award of a degree, diploma, or certificate is currently withheld pending the outcome of disciplinary proceedings concerning misconduct in an examination relating to that award; a discretionary power has been substituted.

(vi)Removal of quasi-judicial language from the student disciplinary procedures, including the renaming of the Court of Discipline as the Discipline Committee and the Summary Court as the Discipline Board, to make the procedures less formal.

5. The main disciplinary bodies of the University (the Septemviri, the University Tribunal, the Court of Discipline, and the Summary Court) are established under Statute D II. The Council and the General Board, on the recommendation of the Review Committee, have agreed that it would be appropriate for the bodies governing student discipline to be defined in Special Ordinance, as matters more properly within the purview of the University. Amendments are therefore being proposed to transfer those provisions relating to the Court of Discipline and the Summary Court from Statute D II to Special Ordinance, and instead recording in Statute the authority for the University to establish by Special Ordinance the bodies with responsibility for student discipline and appeals arising from such cases.

6. It has become apparent that, in relation to student discipline, there is no provision enabling a charge of harassment to be brought, and therefore it is being proposed that a new regulation should be added to the General Regulations for Discipline to remedy this.

7. The Council and the General Board have also endorsed other recommendations made by the Review Committee as part of this first stage of the review, including:

(a)Amendments to the procedures, to ensure that the same guidance is applicable to all investigative meetings attended by students, whether these are convened by the University Advocate or others, such as the Examiners or the Proctors;

(b)Confirmation of the current position regarding the right of the student to be accompanied at an investigative meeting, prior to the bringing of charges. A student is normally accompanied by her or his College Tutor or a Cambridge University Students Union (CUSU) or Graduate Union (GU) officer and may invite her or his legal representative or adviser. The Committee was invited to consider whether the student should always be accompanied by her or his legal representative or adviser at investigative meetings but does not consider that this is necessary, provided that the student is aware of the purpose of the meeting and that he or she may be so accompanied, and that any information he or she provides at the meeting may be taken into account in considering whether to bring a charge and may be included in evidence against the student at any subsequent hearing;

(c)Dispensing with the wearing of gowns at hearings;

(d)Better documentation of the number of disciplinary cases being handled through the Court of Discipline.

8. The Council and the General Board recommend:

I. That the University's student disciplinary procedures be amended as set out in this Report.

II. That, if Recommendation I is approved, the following new regulation be added as Regulation 6 to the General Regulations for Discipline (Statutes and Ordinances, p. 207) and the remaining regulations and the cross-reference renumbered:

6. No member of the University shall engage in harassment in the course of an academic, sporting, social, cultural, or other activity either within the Precincts of the University or elsewhere in the context of her or his membership of the University or in circumstances where the victim of the harassment is a member, officer, or employee of the University or a College. Harassment shall include single or repeated incidents involving unwanted and unwarranted conduct towards another person which is reasonably likely to have the effect of (i) violating that other's dignity or (ii) creating an intimidating, hostile, degrading, humiliating, or offensive environment for that other.

III. That, if Recommendation I is approved, the changes to Ordinance concerning the membership and meeting arrangements for the Court of Discipline as set out in Annex A be approved, to come into effect from 1 October 2015.

IV. That, if Recommendation I is approved, subject to the approval of Her Majesty in Council the Statutes of the University be amended as set out below and that these amendments be submitted under the Common Seal of the University to Her Majesty in Council for approval, to come into effect on a date approved by the Council.

(a) That Statute D (Statutes and Ordinances, p. 29) be rescinded in its entirety and replaced with the following:

Statute D

DISCIPLINE, THE UNIVERSITY COURTS, AND DISCIPLINARY PANELS

Chapter I

DISCIPLINE

For the due maintenance of good order and discipline within the University, the University shall from time to time prescribe such regulations as may be thought expedient in regard to the wearing of academical dress, the rendering of assistance and obedience to all persons in authority in the University and the definition and determination of charges, offences, and penalties.

Chapter II

THE UNIVERSITY COURTS AND DISCIPLINARY PANELS

1. There shall be a court called the University Tribunal, and a court called the Septemviri, which shall be constituted by Special Ordinance. These courts shall have no jurisdiction over the Chancellor, the High Steward, the Deputy High Steward, or the Commissary.

2. The University Tribunal shall adjudicate, in accordance with the provisions of this Statute, when a University officer, a member of the Senate, or a person not in statu pupillari who holds either a degree or the title of a degree is charged with an offence against the discipline of the University, or with grave misconduct, save that a University disciplinary panel established under Section 10 shall adjudicate where all offences are alleged to have been committed during the period in which that person was pursuing a course of study leading to the award of a degree, diploma, or certificate of the University.

3. The University Tribunal may impose any of the following sentences either singly or in combination:

(a)deprivation or suspension of membership of the University;

(b)deprivation or suspension of degree or title of degree, or postponement of, or disqualification from, admission to degree;

(c)deprivation or suspension of the status of Master or Bachelor of Arts;

(d)a fine;

(e)an order to pay compensation;

(f)deprivation or suspension of the right to use University premises or facilities;

(g)any sentence considered by the Tribunal to be lighter;

or may, notwithstanding that a person charged has been found to have committed an offence, resolve not to impose any sentence; provided that any person who is deprived of membership of the University or whose membership of the University is suspended shall thereby suffer deprivation or suspension of degrees and titles of degrees during the continuance of such deprivation or suspension.

4. Any person sentenced by the University Tribunal may appeal to the Septemviri within twenty-eight days after notice of the Tribunal's decision. Such an appeal shall be subject to such conditions as are determined by Special Ordinance.

5. The Septemviri shall act as a court of appeal and

(a)shall hear appeals by persons holding any of the University offices specified or referred to in Statute C I 1(a), except the offices of Chancellor, High Steward, Deputy High Steward, and Commissary in accordance with the provisions of Chapter V of the Schedule to Statute C and such other provisions as may be determined by Special Ordinance;

(b)shall hear appeals by other persons charged before the University Tribunal from findings or sentences of the Tribunal, and shall have power to quash a finding or to vary a sentence to any sentence within the limits of the power of the Tribunal;

(c)shall hear such appeals from the decisions of other University bodies as may be determined by Special Ordinance, and shall have power to quash a finding or to vary a penalty to any penalty within the limits of the power of the applicable body.

6. Subject to the provisions of the Schedule to Statute C, the University Tribunal and the Septemviri shall have power to make rules of procedure except in so far as such rules may have been determined by Statute or Ordinance; provided that, if any question of law or of interpretation or application of any of the rules of procedure arises during the course of a hearing, or if a question of procedure arises which cannot be resolved by reference to those rules, the matter shall be decided by the Chair, whose decision shall, for the case which is being heard, be final. The Chair of the Septemviri may issue supplementary practice directions in respect of the Septemviri, the University Tribunal, or any other University body for which it determines matters on appeal. The Chair of the University Tribunal may issue supplementary practice directions in respect of the University Tribunal.

7. Every finding or ruling of the Septemviri or the University Tribunal and every determination of an appeal by the Septemviri shall require the concurrence of a majority of the members present.

8. The Septemviri is to consist of a legally qualified member of the University appointed by Grace as Chair and six members of the Regent House, each appointed by Grace. Detailed provision for these appointments shall be made by Special Ordinance.

9. The University Tribunal is to consist of a legally qualified member of the University as Chair and four members of the Regent House, each appointed by Grace. Provision for the appointment of the Chair and members shall be made by Special Ordinance.

10. There shall be such University disciplinary panels for the regulation of student discipline as shall be determined by Special Ordinance. These panels shall have no jurisdiction over the Chancellor, the High Steward, the Deputy High Steward, or the Commissary. Such panels shall have power to make rules of procedure except in so far as such rules may have been determined by Statute or Ordinance; provided that, if any question of law or interpretation or application of any of the rules of procedure arises during the course of a hearing, or if a question of procedure arises which cannot be resolved by reference to those rules, the matter shall be decided by the Chair, whose decision shall, for the case which is being heard, be final.

11. Notice of a meeting of the Septemviri or the University Tribunal shall be given to the Head of the College of which the person charged or making an appeal is a member.

12. If a charge of misconduct in an examination has been brought against any person before a University disciplinary panel and if such person's qualification for the award of a degree, diploma, or certificate is or includes success in that examination, it shall be at the discretion of the Chair of such panel to order that he or she shall not be admitted to the degree, or receive the diploma or certificate, until the charge has been finally disposed of, notwithstanding that he or she may have done all that is required by Statute or Ordinance for the award of the degree, diploma, or certificate. If the disciplinary panel finds that a person so charged has committed the breach of conduct, it may advise the Vice-Chancellor to issue a notice amending the class-list for the examination or other list of approved candidates, or to issue an amended list superseding the original list; and, if no appeal is made to the Septemviri, the Vice-Chancellor shall act in accordance with the advice of the disciplinary panel or, if an appeal is made to the Septemviri, in accordance with the decision of that court.

13. Subject to the provisions of Section 14 of this chapter, any person whose case is being heard or adjudicated upon by the Septemviri, the University Tribunal, or any disciplinary panel established under Section 10 above

(a)shall be given a reasonable opportunity of being heard by such court or panel; and

(b)shall have the right to call witnesses and to question witnesses upon whose evidence the case against her or him is based; provided that in the case of an appeal neither party to the case shall recall witnesses examined at first instance or introduce additional evidence except with the leave of the Chair of the court or panel, which shall be given only if the Chair is satisfied that to do so is necessary or expedient in the interests of justice.

14. Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 13 of this chapter, any disciplinary panel established under Section 10 may conduct the whole or part of its proceedings on the basis of written statements submitted by the parties and the Septemviri and the University Tribunal may, if or to the extent that it appears to the Chair to be impracticable to conduct an oral hearing, proceed likewise.

15. If any person in statu pupillari intentionally or recklessly disrupts or impedes the proceedings of any of the aforesaid courts or other disciplinary panels, the Chair of the court or panel shall have power, either singly or in combination:

(a)to impose a fine not exceeding such sum as shall be determined from time to time by Ordinance;

(b)to exclude such person from the court or panel;

(c)to rusticate such person for a period not longer than the duration of the proceedings before the court or panel;

and the decision of the Chair shall be final; provided that a person rusticated under this section may, through her or his Tutor, apply to the Chair who imposed the sentence for a review of the penalty on grounds of undue hardship and the Chair shall have power to revoke or vary the penalty. An order of rustication shall take effect notwithstanding that such an application may have been made.

16. Subject to any limitations that may be imposed by Ordinance, the fact that any person has been or is liable to be prosecuted in a court of law in respect of an act or conduct which is the subject of the proceedings before them shall not affect the jurisdiction and powers of the Septemviri, the University Tribunal, or any disciplinary panel established under Section 10 of this Statute.

(b) That in Statute A IX 3(b)(i) (Statutes and Ordinances, p. 11) the words 'a University court' be replaced with 'a University court or disciplinary panel'.

(c) That in Statute B I 2 (Statutes and Ordinances, p. 15) the words 'deprivation by decision of a University court' be replaced with 'deprivation by decision of a University court or disciplinary panel'.

(d) That in Statute C III 5(b)(ii) (Statutes and Ordinances, p. 19) the words 'a University court constituted by or under Statute D' be replaced with 'a University court or disciplinary panel constituted by or under Statute D'.

V. That, with effect from and conditional upon the approval by Her Majesty in Council of the Statutes in Recommendation II above, the changes to Special Ordinance and Ordinance as set out in Annexes B and C be approved.

23 June 2015

L. K. Borysiewicz, Vice-Chancellor

Helen Hoogewerf-McComb

Shirley Pearce

Richard Anthony

Alice Hutchings

John Shakeshaft

Jeremy Caddick

Fiona Karet

Susan Smith

R. Charles

Stuart Laing

Sara Weller

Anne Davis

Rebecca Lingwood

I.H. White

David Good

Rachael Padman

A.D. Yates

Nicholas Holmes

19 June 2015

L. K. Borysiewicz, Vice-Chancellor

Robert Kennicutt

Richard Prager

Philip Allmendinger

Duncan Maskell

Rob Richardson

M. J. Daunton

Patrick Maxwell

Graham Virgo

Anne Davis

Martin Millett

Chris Young

David Good

Rachael Padman

Annex A

With effect from 1 October 2015,1 by amending Regulations 3, 5, and 6 of the regulations for the appointment of members of the Court of Discipline (Statutes and Ordinances, p. 214) so as to read:

3. The Council shall maintain a panel, hereinafter referred to as panel (b), of members of the Regent House who are prepared to serve as members of the Court of Discipline and the Summary Court, and shall appoint up to twenty persons to the panel in the Michaelmas Term of each year, to serve for one year from 1 January following their appointment. No member of the Council or of the Septemviri shall be a member of panel (b).

5. The Chair of the Court of Discipline shall be appointed by the Vice-Chancellor from among those members of panel (a) who are able and willing to act as Chair for a particular case. If subsequently the Chair so appointed is unable or unwilling to act, the Vice-Chancellor shall appoint another member of panel (a) to act as Chair for that case.

6. The Clerk of the Court shall, on the instructions of the Chair for the particular case, send written notice to all members of panel (b) and, when appropriate, of panel (c), informing them of the dates and times the Chair is available to attend a hearing, and requiring them to indicate, not later than 5 p.m. on the fourth day after the day on which the notice is despatched, whether they are able and willing to serve on any of those dates. The Chair shall then appoint the other members of the Court in accordance with the provisions of Regulation 1 by causing lots to be drawn from among those members of panel (b) and, when appropriate, of panel (c) who have informed the Clerk of the Court that they are able and willing to serve; and the Clerk of the Court shall thereupon inform the persons appointed of the charge or charges to be heard and the name and College of the person charged, and the location of the hearing. The Chair shall in like manner appoint three reserve members of the Court from panel (b) and, when appropriate, up to three from panel (c) who shall be required to be available to attend the hearing so that lots may be drawn from among them if it becomes necessary to replace any member or members of the Court who have failed to attend or who have otherwise become unable or unwilling to serve or against whose membership the Chair has under Regulation 7 allowed an objection. No member of the Court shall be replaced after the commencement of the proceedings.

Footnotes

  • 1If the amendments to Statute D are approved, these revisions will be superseded by the amendments under Annex C (ii).


Annex B

(i) By inserting the following as the last sentence in Special Ordinance D (i) 1 (Statutes and Ordinances, p. 101):

The Registrary, or a deputy appointed by the Registrary, shall be Clerk of the Septemviri.

(ii) By inserting the following new Special Ordinance D (ii) and renumbering existing Special Ordinances D (ii) and (iii):

SPECIAL ORDINANCE D (ii):
University disciplinary panels and appeal bodies
(Special Ordinance under Statute D II 10)

1. There shall be a University disciplinary panel, called the Discipline Committee, which shall consist of a Chair, who shall be legally qualified or shall have had experience of acting in a judicial capacity, and four members of the University, not more than two of whom may be persons in statu pupillari.

2. As an appeal panel, the Discipline Committee shall hear appeals from findings of any disciplinary panel established under the provisions of Section 9 of this Special Ordinance and shall have power to quash the finding. The decision of the Discipline Committee on an appeal shall be final.

3. As a body hearing a case at first instance the Discipline Committee shall, subject to the provisions of this Special Ordinance, adjudicate when any person in statu pupillari and any person resident in the University with a view to matriculation is charged with a breach of the general regulations for discipline or other offence against the discipline of the University. The Discipline Committee shall also adjudicate when a University officer, a member of the Senate, or a person not in statu pupillari who holds either a degree or the title of a degree or has been admitted to a course of study open to non-members of the University is charged only with breaches of the general regulations for discipline or other offences which are alleged to have been committed during the period in which that person was pursuing a course of study leading to the award of a degree, diploma, or certificate of the University.

The procedure for the initiation of proceedings before the Discipline Committee shall be prescribed by Ordinance. The Discipline Committee may impose the following penalties, either singly or in combination:

(a)deprivation or suspension of membership of the University;

(b)deprivation or suspension of degree, or postponement of, or disqualification from, admission to degree;

(c)deprivation or suspension of the status of Bachelor of Arts;

(d)rustication which is exclusion from residence in the Precincts of the University;

(e)an order to pay compensation;

(f)deprivation or suspension of the right to use University premises or facilities;

(g)any sentence considered by the Discipline Committee to be lighter;

or may, notwithstanding that a person charged has been found to have committed a breach of the general regulations for discipline or other offence against the discipline of the University, resolve not to impose any penalty; provided that any person who is deprived of membership of the University or whose membership of the University is suspended shall thereby suffer deprivation or suspension of all degrees during the continuance of such deprivation or suspension.

4. The Registrary or a deputy appointed by the Registrary shall be Secretary of the University disciplinary panels.

5. Notice of a meeting of a University disciplinary panel shall be given to the Head of the College of which the person charged or making an appeal is a member.

6. The Discipline Committee and a panel of summary jurisdiction established under Section 9 below shall have power to make rules of procedure except in so far as such rules may have been determined by Statute or Ordinance; provided that, if any question of law or interpretation or application of any of the rules of procedure arises during the course of a hearing, or if a question of procedure arises which cannot be resolved by reference to those rules, the matter shall be decided by the Chair, whose decision shall, for the case which is being heard, be final.

7. The Septemviri shall hear appeals by persons charged before the Discipline Committee from findings or the penalties imposed by that Committee and shall have power to quash a finding or to vary a penalty to any penalty within the limits of the power of the Discipline Committee.

8. The method and period of appointment of the members of the Discipline Committee shall be determined by Ordinance; provided that

(i)no member of the Council or of the Septemviri and no person who has been elected or appointed but not yet become a member of either of those bodies shall be a member of the Committee;

(ii)a member of the Committee who becomes a member of the Council shall nevertheless remain a member of the Committee until the conclusion of the proceedings for which he or she has been appointed but shall not attend a meeting or receive papers for a meeting of the Council, and such continued membership of the Committee shall constitute a sufficient cause for absence from meetings of the Council.

Three members of the Committee shall constitute a quorum and every finding or penalty shall require the concurrence of the votes of a majority of the members present. If any member of the Committee is unable or unwilling to act in connection with a particular charge or appeal, he or she shall be replaced by an alternate who shall be appointed in a manner prescribed by Ordinance.

9. The University may by Ordinance establish a panel of summary jurisdiction ('the Discipline Board') and make provision whereby, notwithstanding the provisions of Section 3 of this Special Ordinance, such panel may adjudicate on a case at first instance when any person is charged with a breach of the general regulations for discipline or other offence against the discipline of the University who comes within the jurisdiction of the Discipline Committee. Such a panel may award the following penalties either singly or in combination:

(a)a fine not exceeding such sum as shall be determined by Ordinance;

(b)any order to pay compensation not exceeding such sum as shall be determined by Ordinance;

(c)deprivation or suspension of the right to use University premises or facilities;

(d)any sentence considered by the panel to be lighter;

or may, notwithstanding that a person has been found to have breached the general regulations for discipline or committed another offence against the discipline of the University, resolve not to impose any penalty. Any person against whom a penalty is imposed by a panel established under this section may, if he or she obtains leave either from the Chair of the panel or from the Chair of the Discipline Committee, appeal in accordance with a procedure determined by Ordinance to the Discipline Committee from the finding of the panel but no person shall be given leave to appeal against the penalty imposed. The composition of such a panel, its method of appointment and rules of procedure, and the procedure for the initiation of proceedings before the panel shall be determined by Ordinance. A panel established under this section shall have such functions and powers as an appeal panel as may be determined by Ordinance.

10. The Discipline Board is to consist of a legally qualified member of the University as Chair, one member of the Regent House, and one member in statu pupillari. Provision for the appointment of the Chair and members shall be made by Ordinance.

11. If any person has been or is liable to be prosecuted in a court of law in respect of an act or conduct which is the subject of proceedings before a University disciplinary panel, the proceedings of that panel may, at the discretion of the Chair of the panel, be stayed until the court proceedings in respect of that act or conduct have concluded, whether by conviction, acquittal or discontinuance of proceedings, or the Chair of the panel is satisfied that the person is not likely to be prosecuted.

12. If a complaint has been made under a student complaints procedure approved by the Council by a person in respect of an act or conduct which is also the subject of proceedings before a University disciplinary panel against that same person, the proceedings of that panel may, at the discretion of the Chair of the panel, be stayed to allow for the conclusion of that complaint procedure and, if applicable, to allow for the conclusion of the consideration of an associated complaint made to the Office of the Independent Adjudicator.1 A stay imposed under this provision may be extended or lifted at any time by the Chair of the panel at her or his discretion.

Footnotes

(iii) By revising existing Special Ordinance D (iii) (Statutes and Ordinances, p. 102) so as to read:

SPECIAL ORDINANCE D (iv):
The University Advocate; miscellaneous provisions
(Special Ordinance under Statute D)

1. Evidence that a person has been convicted of an offence by or before any court of law, or that any court of law has found proved an offence with which a person was charged, shall, for the purpose of proving that he or she committed the offence or was guilty of any act or conduct in respect of which he or she was so charged or convicted, be admissible in any proceedings before any court or disciplinary panel established by Statute D or any Special Ordinance under Statute D.

2. Any notice required by Statute D, or by Ordinance or regulation made under it, to be sent to any person may be sent to the address supplied to the Registrary by that person's College as her or his usual or last known address.

3. If the time for which any member of one of the aforesaid courts or disciplinary panels has been appointed expires after a charge or appeal has been brought before the court or panel but before it has been disposed of, such member shall (and her or his successor shall not) be a member of the court or panel for the purpose of hearing and determining that charge or appeal.

4. If, after a charge or appeal has been brought before any of the aforesaid courts or panels but before it has been disposed of, one or more members of the court or panel become unable or unwilling to act, the remaining members of the court or panel may continue the hearing and determine the case notwithstanding that they do not constitute a quorum for that court or panel.

5. Any person whose case is adjudicated upon by the Discipline Committee shall be given a reasoned decision in writing.

6. Any person who is deprived of membership of the University or whose membership of the University is suspended shall not, during the continuance of such deprivation or suspension, be eligible to be admitted to any degree, or to receive any diploma or certificate, or to be a candidate for any examination; and any person upon whom a penalty other than deprivation or suspension of membership of the University is imposed under any of the provisions of Statute D or any Special Ordinance made under it and who fails to comply with the terms of such penalty shall not be eligible to be admitted to any degree, or to receive any diploma or certificate, or, except with the consent of the Council, to be a candidate for any examination.

7. Every complaint against a person who comes within the jurisdiction of the University Tribunal or the Discipline Committee (other than a complaint against a University officer under the Schedule to Statute C)2 which requests that a matter be made the subject of proceedings before either of those bodies shall be considered by the University Advocate, provided that only a member of the Regent House shall be entitled to make a complaint alleging that a person who comes within the jurisdiction of the University Tribunal has committed grave misconduct, and that only a member or an employee of the University shall be entitled to make a complaint alleging that a person who comes within the jurisdiction of either of those bodies has committed a breach of the general regulations for discipline or other offence against the discipline of the University. It shall be the duty of the Advocate to determine whether the person against whom the complaint is made shall be charged and if so before which body; provided that the Advocate shall reject any complaint

(a)

if it does not specify the name, and College (if any), of the person against whom it is made;

or

(b)

if in the Advocate's opinion the evidence presented is not sufficient to enable her or him to decide whether the person should be so charged;

or

(c)

if in the Advocate's opinion a complaint is vexatious, frivolous, or trivial;

or

(d)

if in the Advocate's opinion a complaint of grave misconduct is not of sufficiently direct concern to the University to justify its being brought before the University Tribunal.

No proceedings shall be initiated before any of the University disciplinary panels established by Statute D or any Special Ordinance under Statute D, other than proceedings under the provisions of the Schedule to Statute C,2 unless the Advocate has so determined in accordance with this section and with any Ordinance made under Statute D.

(iv) In Special Ordinance A (ii) 2(e) (Statutes and Ordinances, p. 65) by replacing the words 'or suffers rustication by a University court or by a College' with 'or suffers rustication by a University court or disciplinary panel or by a College'.

(v) In Special Ordinance A (vii) 4(c)(ii) and 5 (Statutes and Ordinances, p. 70) by replacing the words 'to any decision of a University court established by Statute D II' with 'to any decision of a University court or disciplinary panel established by Statute D II', and 'to meetings of any court constituted by or under Statute D' with 'to meetings of any court or disciplinary panel constituted by or under Statute D', respectively.

Annex C

(i) By revising the regulations for the initiation of proceedings before the University Tribunal, the Court of Discipline, or the Summary Court (Statutes and Ordinances, p. 211) so as to read:

Initiation of proceedings before the University Tribunal, the Discipline Committee, or the Discipline Board

1. Any proceedings against a person to whom the Schedule to Statute C applies shall be subject to the provisions of Chapter III of that Schedule. Proceedings against any other member of the University shall be subject to the provisions of Special Ordinance D (iv) 7.

2. (a) If the Vice-Chancellor has directed under the Schedule to Statute C, Chapter III 8, that a charge is to be preferred against a person to whom the Schedule to Statute C applies, the case shall be presented by the University Advocate.

(b) If in response to a complaint made under Special Ordinance D (iv) 7 the University Advocate determines that proceedings shall be brought against a member of the University before the University Tribunal or the Discipline Committee or the Discipline Board, the case shall be presented either by the Advocate or by the complainant, as may be decided by the Advocate; provided that, if a charge arises from a complaint made by the Proctors, the Advocate shall be responsible for presenting the case on behalf of the University.

3. The Advocate shall give written notice to the Registrary and to the complainant of the decisions taken in accordance with Special Ordinance D (iv) 7 and Regulation 2(b) above; if the Advocate decides that a person is to be charged, written notice shall be given to the Secretary of the appropriate court or disciplinary panel.

4. If a member of the University commits an act or engages in conduct for which he or she is liable to be prosecuted in a court of law and which is also a breach of the general regulations for discipline or other offence against the discipline of the University, such member shall not be charged under the University's regulations unless the Advocate is satisfied either that any proceedings against the member in a court of law in respect of that act or conduct have been completed and that he or she has been convicted of an offence or that the member is unlikely to be prosecuted in a court of law in respect of that act or conduct.

5. If a member of the University in statu pupillari is charged with a breach of the general regulations for discipline or other offence against the discipline of the University in respect of an act or conduct for which he or she has been convicted of an offence in a court of law, such member may on proof of such conviction have a penalty of deprivation or suspension of membership of the University imposed, or may be rusticated, or deprived of any particular privileges or facilities in the University, provided that such action is in the opinion of the Discipline Committee necessary for the protection of the interests of the University; but he or she shall not be liable to any other penalty.

6. If a member of the University in statu pupillari commits an act which is a breach of the general regulations for discipline or other offence against the discipline of the University and also a breach of the discipline of his or her College, such member shall be charged before a University court or disciplinary panel only if the Advocate is satisfied

either

(a)

that such member will not be subject to disciplinary proceedings in respect of that act by her or his College;

or

(b)

that the general interest of the University in the maintenance of good order and discipline in the University is not likely otherwise to be sufficiently protected.

7. In these regulations all references to conviction in a court of law shall mean that the court has found that the offence charged has been proved and that the person so charged has not been acquitted either upon trial or upon appeal.

(ii) By revising the regulations for the appointment of members of the Court of Discipline and its rules of procedure (Statutes and Ordinances, p. 214) so as to read:

Appointment of members of the Discipline Committee

1. Any person against whom the University Advocate has determined that a charge shall be brought before the Discipline Committee shall be entitled, subject to the provisions of Regulations 8 and 9, to choose whether, for those proceedings, the Committee shall consist, in addition to the Chair, of two members of the Regent House and two persons in statu pupillari or of four members of the Regent House; provided that if, within seven days after notice of the charge, such person fails to notify his or her choice to the Secretary of the Committee, the Committee shall, subject to the provisions of Regulations 8 and 9, consist of the Chair, two members of the Regent House, and two persons in statu pupillari.

2. The Council shall maintain a panel, hereinafter referred to as panel (a), of persons who are eligible under Special Ordinance D (ii) 1 to serve as Chair of the Discipline Committee and who are willing to do so, and shall appoint in the Michaelmas Term in each year such number of persons as the Council may think fit, to serve as members of the panel for one year from 1 January following their appointment. No member of the Council shall be a member of panel (a).

3. The Council shall maintain a panel, hereinafter referred to as panel (b), of members of the Regent House who are prepared to serve as members of the Discipline Committee and the Discipline Board, and shall appoint up to twenty persons to the panel in the Michaelmas Term of each year, to serve for one year from 1 January following their appointment. No member of the Council or of the Septemviri shall be a member of panel (b).

4. The Council shall invite the Junior Combination Room Committee of each College, or if in any College there is no such Committee such other body as in the Council's opinion is the nearest equivalent to a Junior Combination Room Committee, to nominate, not later than the division of the Michaelmas Term in each year, one eligible member of the College for appointment by the Council to a panel, hereinafter referred to as panel (c), of members of the University in statu pupillari to serve as members of the Discipline Committee and the Discipline Board. An eligible member of the College shall be a member of the College in statu pupillari who is willing to serve on panel (c) and who is keeping terms by residence or, having kept the number of terms required, is pursuing a course of study or research in the University. Not later than the last day of the Michaelmas Term in each year the Council shall announce the names of the persons whom they have appointed members of panel (c). The persons appointed shall serve for one year from 1 January following their appointment; provided that if a member ceases to be an eligible member of a College as defined in this regulation, he or she shall cease to be a member of panel (c).

5. The Chair of the Discipline Committee shall be appointed by the Vice-Chancellor from among those members of panel (a) who are able and willing to act as Chair for a particular case. If subsequently the Chair so appointed is unable or unwilling to act, the Vice-Chancellor shall appoint another member of panel (a) to act as Chair for that case.

6. The Secretary of the Committee shall, on the instructions of the Chair for the particular case, send written notice to all members of panel (b) and, when appropriate, of panel (c), informing them of the dates and times the Chair is available to attend a hearing, and requiring them to indicate, not later than 5 p.m. on the fourth day after the day on which the notice is despatched, whether they are able and willing to serve on any of those dates. The Chair shall then appoint the other members of the Committee in accordance with the provisions of Regulation 1 by causing lots to be drawn from among those members of panel (b) and, when appropriate, of panel (c) who have informed the Secretary of the Committee that they are able and willing to serve; and the Secretary of the Committee shall thereupon inform the persons appointed of the charge or charges to be heard and the name and College of the person charged and the location of the hearing. The Chair shall in like manner appoint up to three reserve members of the Committee from panel (b) and, when appropriate, up to three from panel (c) who shall be required to be available to attend the hearing so that lots may be drawn from among them if it becomes necessary to replace any member or members of the Committee who have failed to attend or who have otherwise become unable or unwilling to serve or against whose membership the Chair has under Regulation 7 allowed an objection. No member of the Committee shall be replaced after the commencement of the proceedings.

7. A person charged before the Committee shall be entitled to object for good cause to any member appointed to serve on the Committee for those proceedings. The Chair alone shall rule on any such objection and her or his decision shall be final.

8. If at the commencement of the hearing the Chair is unable under the provisions of Regulation 6 to appoint the appropriate number of members of the Committee from panel (b) or panel (c), he or she shall appoint such number of members from the appropriate panel as may be needed to fill the vacant place or places; provided that, if in the Chair's judgement the appointment of a member or members from panel (c) cannot be achieved without undue delay, the Chair shall be empowered to appoint a member or members from panel (b) to fill the vacant place or places.

9. If on any occasion there are insufficient members of panel (b) or panel (c) who are able and willing to serve as members of the Committee, the Vice-Chancellor shall appoint the appropriate number of members of the Regent House to fill the vacant places on the Committee.

Rules of Procedure

1. The Secretary of the Discipline Committee shall send to any person charged before the Committee written notice of (a) the complaint against her or him, and (b) the date, time, and location of the Committee hearing, and shall draw attention to the provisions of the regulations for the appointment of members of the Committee whereby the person charged is entitled to choose the composition of the Committee. Copies of such notice shall be sent to the complainant and to the Head of the College of the person charged.

2. The Committee may sit either in public or in private at the discretion of the Chair except that, when the person charged requests that it shall sit in private, the Chair shall normally so decide. If the Committee sits in private, the following shall be entitled to be present: the person charged, her or his Tutor (or a deputy appointed by the Tutor), the Head of her or his College (or a deputy appointed by the Head), the University Advocate, the complainant, and any person appointed to represent the person charged, the complainant, or the University Advocate.

3. Whether the Committee sits in public or in private, it may proceed in the absence of any of the persons entitled to be present and, notwithstanding Regulation 2, the Chair shall have power to exclude any person if in the opinion of the Chair such exclusion is necessary for the maintenance of order.

4. The Chair shall not impose under Statute D (ii) 15 any fine exceeding £175.

5. The Committee shall not find a charge proved unless it is satisfied that the charge has been proved beyond reasonable doubt.

6. Any penalty imposed by the Committee shall have immediate effect; provided that the Chair of the Committee and the Chair of the Septemviri shall each have power to suspend the imposition of a penalty until the conclusion of the proceedings by the Septemviri of any appeal against a decision of the Committee.

7. Any person who appeals to the Discipline Committee shall notify the Registrary in writing. Such notice shall specify the grounds of the appeal and shall state whether the appeal is in respect of the whole or in respect of any specified part of the finding of the Discipline Board. Except with the leave of the Discipline Committee, the appellant shall not be entitled in the proceedings of an appeal to rely on any grounds of appeal not specified in the notice of appeal.

(iii) By revising the regulations for the Summary Court (Statutes and Ordinances, p. 216) so as to read:

Discipline Board

1. A panel, called the Discipline Board, shall be established under the provisions of Special Ordinance D (ii) 9 and shall, except as provided in Regulations 6 and 7, consist of a Chair, one member of the Regent House, and one member of the University in statu pupillari. Two members of the Discipline Board shall constitute a quorum. Every finding of the Board and every decision on penalty shall require the concurrence of at least two members of the Board.

2. The Chair and a Deputy Chair, both of whom shall be legally qualified members of the Senate, shall be appointed by the Vice-Chancellor in the Michaelmas Term in each year to serve for one year from 1 January following their appointment.

3. The Chair of the Discipline Board shall as soon as may be convenient in the Lent Term appoint the other two members of the Board to serve until 31 December following their appointment by causing lots to be drawn from among the members of panel (b) and panel (c) for the Discipline Committee.

4. A person charged before the Board shall be entitled to object for good cause to any member of the Board. The Chair alone shall rule on any such objection and her or his decision shall be final.

5. The Deputy Chair shall act in place of the Chair on any occasion when the Chair is unable or unwilling to act. If any member of the Board other than the Chair is unable or unwilling to serve for the proceedings of a particular case, or if the Chair allows an objection under Regulation 4 to a member of the Board other than the Chair, the Chair shall appoint by lot a member of the appropriate panel to replace such member.

6. If the Chair is able to appoint only one of the other members of the Board in accordance with these regulations, the Board shall proceed as a Board of two members.

7. If the Chair is unable to appoint any other member of the Board in accordance with these regulations the Chair alone shall constitute the Board and shall, notwithstanding the provisions of Regulation 1, have power to exercise any of the powers of the Board.

8. The Registrary, or a duly appointed deputy, shall be Secretary of the Discipline Board.

9. When the University Advocate determines that a charge shall be heard by the Discipline Board, he or she shall send to the Secretary of the Board, for service on the person charged,

(a)a notice informing the person charged of the breach or offence he or she is alleged to have committed and stating the amount of any fine (not exceeding £175) and of any order for compensation (not exceeding £250) which the University Advocate would consider appropriate if the alleged breach were proved,

(b)a statement of the facts which would be placed before the Discipline Board by or on behalf of the Advocate if the person charged did not appear before the Board.

10. The Secretary of the Board shall thereupon serve on the person charged copies of the notice and the statement sent by the University Advocate and shall in writing inform her or him of

(a)the date, time, and place fixed for the hearing;

(b)the powers of the Board, under Regulation 11 below, to adjudicate in the absence of the person charged.

The Clerk shall invite the person charged to state in writing

(i)whether he or she admits the alleged breach or offence;

(ii)whether he or she disputes the amount of the fine or compensation specified in the University Advocate's notice;

(iii)whether he or she proposes to attend the hearing;

and, if the person charged does not propose to attend the hearing, shall invite her or him to submit in writing any facts which it is desired to draw to the attention of the Board.

11. If the Board is satisfied that the procedures prescribed in Regulations 9 and 10 have been carried out, it may proceed to hear and dispose of the case in the absence of the person charged, whether or not the Advocate is also absent; provided that

(a)the Board shall not allow any statement of the facts to be made by or on behalf of the University Advocate other than the statement served on the person charged in accordance with Regulations 9 and 10;

(b)the Board shall not impose a fine or order compensation exceeding the amounts specified by the University Advocate under Regulation 9(a);

(c)the Board may adjourn the proceedings at any time and require the person charged to attend.

12. The Board may sit either in public or in private at the discretion of the Chair.

13. The Board shall have power when hearing a case at first instance to determine at any time, subject to the consent of the person charged, not to proceed with the hearing and to require the University Advocate to bring the charge and present the case before the Discipline Committee.

14. The Board shall not in respect of a single breach impose on any person a fine exceeding £175 or order compensation exceeding £250.

15. Any person found by the Board when hearing a case at first instance to have committed a breach of the general regulations for discipline or other offence against the discipline of the University shall, if he or she wishes to appeal under Special Ordinance D (ii) 9 to the Discipline Committee, deliver to the Secretary of the Board, within twenty-eight days after notice of the decision of the Board, written application for leave to appeal.

16. Any penalty imposed by the Board shall have immediate effect; provided that the Chair of the Board and the Chair of the Discipline Committee shall each have power to suspend the imposition of a penalty until the conclusion of the proceedings by the Discipline Committee of any appeal against a finding of the Board.

17. As an appeal panel, the Discipline Board shall hear appeals by persons who come within the jurisdiction of the Discipline Committee under Special Ordinance D (ii) 3 and upon whom a University authority (other than the Discipline Committee) has, under Statute, or in accordance with an Ordinance or with a rule made under an Ordinance, imposed a penalty, provided that such a person has delivered to the Secretary of the Discipline Board, within twenty-eight days after notice of the penalty imposed by the University authority concerned, written notice of appeal to the Board; and the Board shall have power to quash the finding or to vary the penalty imposed within the limits of the power of the authority in question, and its decision shall be final.

18. If a person charged or an appellant appears before the Board, he or she may be represented at the proceedings only by a resident member of the Regent House or by a resident member of the University in statu pupillari or by a representative of Cambridge University Students Union or the Graduate Union.

19. Except in so far as the procedure of the Board is determined under the provisions of Special Ordinance D (ii) and of these regulations, it shall be determined by the Chair.

(iv) In Regulation 35 of the Procedures to Determine Fitness to Practise of Preclinical and Clinical Medical Students (Statutes and Ordinances, p. 225) by replacing the words 'until the criminal courts or University courts (as appropriate) have ruled finally on the matter' with 'until the criminal courts or University courts or disciplinary panels (as appropriate) have ruled finally on the matter'; and in Regulation 45 by replacing the words 'a University court' with 'a University court or disciplinary panel' twice.

(v) In Regulation 35 of the regulations governing Intellectual Property Rights (Statutes and Ordinances, p. 1044) by replacing the words 'under the procedure used to choose a student member of the Court of Discipline' with 'under the procedure used to choose a student member of the Discipline Committee'.

Annex D

If the above amendments are approved, consequential amendments will also be made to the following Notices and Codes of Practice:

(i) In the General Board's University-wide statement on plagiarism (Statutes and Ordinances, p. 207, as amended, Reporter, 6379, 2014–15, p. 422) by amending the last two sentences so as to read:

In addition, suspected cases of the use of unfair means (of which plagiarism is one form) will be investigated and may be brought to one of the University courts or disciplinary panels. The University courts and disciplinary panels have wide powers to discipline those found to have used unfair means in an examination, including depriving such persons of membership of the University, and deprivation of a degree.

(ii) In the Council's Code of Practice issued under section 43 of the Education (No 2) Act 1986 ( Statutes and Ordinances, p. 210) by amending paragraph 2 so as to read:

2. Members of the University are reminded that alleged breaches of the general regulations for discipline and other alleged offences against the discipline of the University may be brought by the University Advocate before the University Tribunal, the Discipline Committee, or the Discipline Board, as appropriate.

Appendix: membership of the Review Committee and its terms of reference

Membership

Professor Graham Virgo (Chair), member of the Court of Discipline in panel (a), Pro-Vice-Chancellor for Education from October 2014, Deputy Chair of the Faculty Board of Law until October 2014;

Professor David Ibbetson, President of Clare Hall, member of the panel of student legal representatives, Faculty of Law;

Professor Loraine Gelsthorpe, Tutor for Graduate Affairs and Graduate Tutor at Pembroke College, Institute of Criminology;

Dr Pippa Rogerson, former University Advocate, Director of Studies, Fellow and Tutor, Gonville and Caius College, Faculty of Law;

Mr Andrew Jefferies, Secretary to the Senior Tutors' Committee;

Mr Jeremy Caddick, member of the Council, Tutor to Graduate Students at Emmanuel College, recently chaired the working group on fitness to practice of medical students;

• Senior Proctor and Junior Proctor ex officio:
Dr Jonathan Holmes and Mr Richard Taplin in 2013–14,
Dr David Woodman and Canon Hugh Shilson-Thomas in 2014–15;

• President of CUSU ex officio and member of the Council:
Ms Helen Hoogewerf-McComb in 2014–15;

• President of the GU ex officio and member of the Council:
Dr Evianne van Gijn in 2014–15.

Terms of reference

a. To review the fitness for purpose and practical operation of the disciplinary procedures, and of the interaction between those processes and the complaints and appeals processes;

b. To consider whether an informal departmental disciplinary procedure might usefully be introduced in order to deal with less serious disciplinary matters and also to facilitate mediation in cases where there were complaints on both sides;

c. After reviewing good practice examples from other institutions and guidance from the Office of the Independent Adjudicator (OIA), to make recommendations to streamline and improve the current procedures, with particular reference to the following:

i. To ensure that the process is proportionate, with minor or straightforward matters being dealt with swiftly under a light touch process, and the full process reserved for more serious or complex cases;

ii. To ensure that the procedure can deal appropriately with a situation in which the student also alleges that she/he has grounds for a complaint;

iii. The division of roles and responsibilities for tasks associated with considering a complaint, proceeding to a hearing, and the provision of advice;

iv. To confirm that the procedure is considered exhausted at an appropriate point, giving recourse to the OIA procedures;

v. To determine whether the same disciplinary procedures should apply to all students of the University;1

vi. To ensure that lines of communication between the Department/Faculty, College, and central administrative offices are working;

vii. To ensure that students and members of Departments/Faculty have clear advice about the operation of disciplinary procedures.

Disciplinary procedures governed by the Schedule to Statute C (formerly Statute U) and student complaints procedures are out of scope. The Review Committee can however make suggestions regarding the latter, on which further consultation would be undertaken.

Footnotes

  • 1Currently the Court of Discipline only has jurisdiction over those in statu pupillari; cases concerning other students are within the jurisdiction of the University Tribunal.


Second-stage Report of the Council on the North Range of buildings on the New Museums site

The Council begs leave to report to the University as follows:

1. In this Report the Council is seeking approval for the construction of a new building and refurbishment works for the North Range of buildings on the New Museums site which includes accommodation for a new Student Services Centre.

2. A First-stage Report on the construction of a new building and refurbishment works for the North Range of buildings on the New Museums site was published on 5 November 2014 (Reporter, 6363, 2014–15, p. 119) and approved by Grace 1 of 10 December 2014. This Second-stage Report is to inform the Regent House about further development of the scheme and to seek approval for construction to proceed.

3. This project is the second phase of the improvements to the quality of the New Museums site proposed by a Master Plan produced under the guidance of a New Museums Site Development Board and approved by the Planning and Resources Committee on 15 October 2014. An electronic copy of the Plan can be found at: http://www.admin.cam.ac.uk/offices/em/estate/site/newmuseums.html.

4. The first phase of improvements, in the form of the refurbishment and alteration of the David Attenborough Building (formerly the Arup Building), will be complete in late 2015. This second phase focuses on the North Range of buildings and will provide accommodation for a new Student Services Centre, improved pedestrian access to the New Museums site from Bene't Street through what is now Bene't Street yard car park, cycle parking for approximately 500 bicycles in the basement of the Arts School, storm water attenuation measures, and the upgrading of an existing basement plant room in the Austin Building, which will in due course house an energy centre serving the whole of the site.

5. The accommodation for the Student Services Centre will be provided through the refurbishment and alteration of the Arts School and the ground floor of the old Cavendish Laboratory East and Rayleigh Wings, together with the construction of a new building on the site of the existing Examinations Hall and a new external courtyard close to Free School Lane. To facilitate the works the existing Examinations Hall, the Mond Building Annex, the gable end of the Austin building, and the Rolls-Royce building will be demolished. In addition a new, discrete pedestrian entrance to the New Museums site will be formed at ground-floor level of the Old Cavendish Laboratory from Bene't Street yard.

6. The Planning and Resources Committee, at their meeting on 15 October 2014, approved the Full Case for the project. The estimated project cost is £39.9m including £6.6m for public realm and infrastructure works, as proposed by the master plan and the demolition works referred to in paragraph 5 above. Funding will come from the University's Capital Fund.

7. The Student Services Centre is planned to be completed and operational by March 2018.

8. Drawings of the proposed development are displayed for the information of the University in the Schools Arcade. A location plan of the New Museums site is shown below.

9. The Council recommends:

I. That approval is confirmed for the demolition and refurbishment works and the construction of a new building on the New Museums site for a Student Services Centre as proposed in this Report.

II. That the Pro-Vice Chancellor (Planning and Resources) be authorized to accept a tender for the works, within the available funding, in due course.

23 June 2015

L. K. Borysiewicz, Vice-Chancellor

Helen Hoogewerf-McComb

Shirley Pearce

Richard Anthony

Alice Hutchings

John Shakeshaft

Jeremy Caddick

Richard Jones

Susan Smith

R. Charles

Fiona Karet

Sara Weller

Anne Davis

Stuart Laing

I. H. White

David Good

Rebecca Lingwood

A. D. Yates

Nicholas Holmes

Rachael Padman

New Museums site: North Range buildings